Agentic AI for SAP AMS

Fewer tickets. Faster resolution. A lower cost to serve.

Tessera's resolution agents learn how your client's SAP actually works: their processes, their configuration, their recurring failures. Then they resolve tickets across ServiceNow, SAP, and the business processes behind them, and get sharper with every fix. Built for the providers who run SAP support.

Specialized agents · human approval where it matters · every action on the record.

Support queue · live open 312resolved 24h 86awaiting you 7
IDoc 51 · partner profile mismatch
INC0048213 · integration agent · reprocessed BD87
resolved
Batch job failure · variant matched
INC0048990 · basis & jobs agent · rerun SM37
resolved
User not authorized · plant 1200
INC0049002 · access agent · role change drafted
awaiting you
Credit block on sales order
INC0048975 · O2C agent · diagnosing
in progress
"How do I run report S_ALR…?"
INC0049010 · knowledge agent · answered + closed
deflected
every action logged · human approval on higher-risk workmedian MTTR 3h 41m
The economics of SAP support

On a support contract, repetitive tickets are pure cost.

A large share of every SAP support queue is access, integration, batch, and how-to work that has been solved before. On fixed-price contracts that volume eats your margin. On bids it inflates your price. And when an experienced engineer leaves, the cost to serve jumps again.

Swipe to explore
Margin pressure

Repetition eats the spread

Thousands of near-identical IDoc, access, and batch tickets a year, each handled by a person, on a price that was fixed years ago.

Linear scaling

Growth means headcount

More volume usually means more people. Spikes, ramps, and new clients are expensive and slow to staff.

Fragile knowledge

Expertise walks out

Resolution knowledge is tacit. Attrition and transitions reset it, and reopen and SLA-breach rates climb.

For SAP support providers

A lower cost to serve on every contract you run.

Tessera agents absorb the repetitive, well-understood work across your clients' SAP and ServiceNow estates. You keep the margin on fixed-price contracts, sharpen your bids, and grow without staffing in a straight line.

15 to 25%
fewer tickets
prevented and deflected, year 1
30 to 50%
faster resolution
MTTR on the categories agents handle
12 to 18%
lower cost to serve
less handling effort, fewer FTEs for the same SLA

Illustrative modeled ranges, not guarantees or customer results. A paid assessment replaces them with figures from your own data. Full model below.

Win

Sharper bids

Differentiate proposals with agentic delivery and a quantified takeout model from a real assessment.

Keep

Protect fixed-price margin

Agents handle the repetitive volume, so the contract costs you less to run for the same SLA.

Scale

Deliver more, same team

Absorb growth and volume spikes without staffing in a straight line.

Ramp

Transition faster

Agents plus the knowledge graph shorten knowledge transfer when you take a contract on.

Retain

Resilient to attrition

Every validated fix becomes memory that stays when people leave.

Run

One platform, many clients

Operate across your whole book of business, each client fully isolated.

Brand

White-label

Run it as your own. Your brand, your client relationship, your IP.

Prove

Measured, not promised

Model the savings per contract, prove them in a pilot, report what actually happened.

What it does to a contract

Where the saving comes from.

Most of the takeout is the addressable share of the queue: access, integration, batch, and how-to work. Agents resolve or assist on that subset, and the freed effort becomes margin on a fixed-price contract, capacity you redeploy, or a more competitive bid. The model on the right is illustrative. Your assessment produces the real numbers from your own data.

Scales with your book of business: from a boutique SAP support shop running one contract to a global delivery organization running hundreds.
Illustrative model · one support contractyour data → real numbers
Annual tickets on the contract50,000
Addressable by agents (access, integration, batch, how-to)~40%
Ticket volume removed (prevented + deflected), yr 115–25%
MTTR improvement on handled categories30–50%
Net reduction in handling effort, yr 112–18%
Effort reduction → FTEs to run the same SLAfewer
Where it goesmargin · capacity · bid
Illustrative only, not a guarantee or a customer result. "Ticket volume removed" combines proactive prevention of recurring issues (problem management) with self-service deflection. Effort reduction translates to fewer people needed to hold the same SLA, which on a fixed-price contract is margin. Shares exclude work your platforms already handle and any category below a confidence or safety threshold. A paid assessment replaces every figure with your own.
Run SAP support in-house? The same agents and the same savings model apply to internal SAP application-support teams measured against an SLA, not only to commercial providers.
What the agents resolve

Real work off your queue.

Each outcome is delivered by one or more Tessera agents. We start narrow, on high-volume, lower-risk work that is easy to verify, then expand where the evidence supports it.

Assessment

knowledge agent

Ingest history and return a taxonomy, scored automation candidates, a savings model, and a roadmap. Read-only.

Triage and routing

triage agent

Classify, prioritize, and route to the right team with related-ticket and knowledge suggestions.

Support copilot

diagnosis + knowledge agents

Grounded answers and resolution plans over your tickets, knowledge, and SAP context, with citations.

Integration auto-heal

integration agent

Diagnose and, on approval, reprocess failed IDocs and batch reruns; then validate, document, and close.

Access and authorization

access agent

Compare roles to templates and draft compliant change requests for approval, then apply them through IAM.

More than support

The run is where your clients' AI journey starts.

Your clients are under pressure to show an AI agenda. The support estate is the most pragmatic place to start, because it is measurable, it is yours to operate, and it pays for itself. Tessera turns that run into a foundation for the bigger mandate you are already advising them on.

Fund it

Savings pay the way

The cost taken out of run frees the budget your clients need for the rest of their AI program, without a new line item.

Found it

A live process map

Every ticket the agents resolve maps where processes actually break and what they cost. That knowledge graph becomes the starting point for automation beyond support.

Lead it

Expand the mandate

From SAP support into integrations, process automation, and analytics on one governed platform, with you positioned as the partner who delivered the first measurable win.

Tessera is the first step in a broader agentic platform. As your clients' AI journey widens, the same foundation extends into adjacent operations rather than starting over with a new tool.

Why these agents are different

They know your client's SAP, not SAP in general.

Generic IT bots stop at the ticket text. Tessera's agents understand the functional processes underneath: the order-to-cash flow, the configuration, the recurring failure patterns specific to that client. See how it works →

Customer-specific

Your processes, your config

Functional knowledge of one client's SAP, not a generic playbook.

Learned in the assessment

Mapped to a knowledge graph

The assessment builds the graph that links tickets to SAP processes and KPIs.

Compounding

Sharper with every fix

Each validated resolution becomes memory, so the agents keep getting better.

Where the agents run

On your clients' stack, not instead of it.

Their service desk stays their service desk

Agents pick up work from ServiceNow and post proposed resolutions back for approval. No rip and replace; you deploy on top of what the client already runs.

SAP stays the system of record

Agents diagnose and act through supported SAP interfaces, and through sanctioned agent-to-agent paths as they arrive, within the client's authorization model and segregation-of-duties rules.

Start with the data

See what the agents would take off your contracts.

Request an assessment. We scope it with you, ingest historical data under your controls, and return a quantified savings model and a roadmap. No production access.

How it works

Learn the client's SAP, then resolve it safely.

It starts with an assessment that maps how that client's SAP actually works into a knowledge graph. The agents reason over that graph, and every action they propose is gated by policy before anything happens. Tessera federates across your systems rather than replacing them.

01 · Integration

Connectors to SAP (S/4, BW/4, CPI and BTP, IDoc, OData, RFC and BAPI), ServiceNow, and identity. Data is queried where it lives; copied only when necessary, within residency controls.

02 · Knowledge

A SAP-AMS knowledge graph and semantic layer, per-client resolution memory, and retrieval indexes that ground every recommendation in your own history.

03 · Agent runtime

Config-driven agents orchestrated through supervisor and graph patterns, with a risk-tiered action model and human-in-the-loop approval queues.

04 · Experience & control

Command center, copilot surfaces, assessment reports, governance and audit dashboards, and cost attribution.

Knowledge graph

A ticket carries its full context.

Incidents, IDocs, orders, configuration, partners, plants, error signatures, and business KPIs live in one semantic model. So when a delivery block arrives, an agent already knows the order, the partner, the interface, the recurring signature, and the KPI it threatens, instead of rediscovering it.

Built during the assessment: 46 entity types and 50+ relationships, plus per-client resolution memory that compounds with every fix.

ErrorSigVKM block Incident IDoc Order Partner Plant KPIDSO Playbookcandidate
representative graph fragment · O2C credit-block signature
Neuro-symbolic governance

An agent proposes. Policy decides.

A language model is good at reading a messy ticket and reasoning toward a fix. It is the wrong thing to trust with a production change on its own. So every action an agent proposes passes through a deterministic policy engine before anything happens.

Reason

Agent proposes

The agent reads the ticket and graph context and proposes a specific action with a confidence score and cited evidence.

Evaluate

Policy engine

Deterministic rules check it:

  • action on the allowlist
  • segregation of duties
  • environment permitted
  • confidence above threshold
Gate

Decision

Auto-resolve, require human approval, or block and escalate, by risk tier. Every decision is recorded with its inputs and the rules applied.

The policy engine is deterministic and is not overridable by model output or prompt content.

Governance

Safe to put in your client's production.

Action is gated by risk. Higher risk means more oversight, never less. This is what lets a provider put agents near production SAP at all.

RiskWhat the agent doesExamples
LowAuto-resolve within allowlistPassword reset, known IDoc reprocess
MediumAct and logJob restart, queue clear
HighRequire human approvalRole change, credit release
CriticalBlock and escalateProduction config, security grants
  • Human-in-the-loop approval queues, with shadow mode before any execution
  • Role- and attribute-based access, with segregation of duties enforced
  • Source attribution and confidence on every recommendation
  • Immutable audit of every agent decision and human approval
  • Per-agent and global rollback and kill switches
  • Per-client data isolation; one client's knowledge is never shared with another
The runtime

What makes agents safe to deploy.

Swipe to explore
Connectivity

Reaches your systems

Federated access to SAP (S/4, CPI and BTP, IDoc, OData, RFC, BAPI), ServiceNow, and identity, querying data where it lives.

Memory

Knowledge that stays

Every validated resolution becomes reusable, versioned, and attributable, isolated to each client tenant.

Execution

Acts within limits

Calls SAP via APIs, BAPI, and OData, with RPA only where no interface exists, never beyond the allowlist.

Deployment

Where you need it

SaaS, private cloud, or fully isolated for regulated estates, one control surface everywhere.

The agents

A fleet of resolution agents that know your SAP.

Each agent owns a slice of the queue and carries functional knowledge of that client's SAP: the processes, the configuration, the recurring failures. They work across ServiceNow, SAP, and the business processes behind a ticket; act only within the scope you grant; and hand off to a person the moment risk or uncertainty crosses your line.

Swipe to explore

Triage

read-only

Reads every incoming ticket, classifies and prioritizes it, and routes it; flags duplicates and related tickets.

acts: classify · route · enrich

O2C diagnosis

read-only

Works credit blocks, delivery blocks, pricing and ATP errors. Traces an order to its condition record and credit check.

reads: VA03 · VKM3 view

P2P diagnosis

read-only

Works PO problems, invoice blocks (MIRO), and payment failures, down to the blocking condition.

reads: ME23N · MIR4

Integration auto-heal

approval-gated

Diagnoses failed interfaces and IDocs, proposes a reprocess with corrected data, and executes it once approved.

acts: BD87 · WE20 check

Access & authorization

approval-gated

Reads a user's roles, compares to a template, drafts a compliant change, and applies it through IAM after approval.

acts: SU01 · PFCG draft

Basis & jobs

approval-gated

Handles batch-job failures and queue issues, proposing a rerun with the known variant.

acts: SM37 rerun

Guardrail

policy

Runs every proposal through the policy engine: allowlist, segregation of duties, environment, confidence, risk tier.

acts: approve · gate · block

Verification

read-only

Confirms the fix worked (for example IDoc status 53) or escalates if results look inconsistent.

reads: status · downstream

Knowledge

read-only

Retrieves prior resolutions and articles with citations, and writes validated fixes back to memory on approval.

acts: retrieve · cite
How far they go

The agents earn autonomy. You set the ceiling.

Every agent starts by watching and advising. It moves up only on the categories where it has proven itself, and only as far as you allow. Most estates keep the higher rungs to a short, explicit allowlist.

Swipe to explore
01

Observe

Learns the queue and builds the picture: taxonomy, clusters, candidates.

02

Recommend

Suggests routing and resolutions grounded in your history, with citations.

03

Assist

Runs read-only diagnostics in SAP and drafts the plan and the ticket response.

04

Execute with approval

Carries out reversible actions only after a person approves, then validates.

05

Resolve within policy

Closes approved low-risk categories end to end, inside the limits you set.

Product

Watch the agents resolve.

Three views: the command center where the fleet runs, a resolution waiting for a human to approve it, and a sample assessment report.

These are Tessera's product interface shown with representative data. They reference SAP transactions (for example BD87, WE20, SU01, SM37) and ServiceNow incident records so they are credible to practitioners. They do not reproduce SAP or ServiceNow interfaces, screens, or logos.
01 · Command Center · the fleet at work
Command Center
client: Northwindenv: PRD-EUwindow: 24h
312
Open incidents
86
Agent-resolved 24h
7
Awaiting approval
3h 41m
Median MTTR
9
SLA at risk
4.2%
Reopen rate

Ticket mix

Access & environment31%
Integration / IDoc / batch19%
Functional O2C / P2P / RTR38%
Technical / performance12%

Agent fleet

Triageonline · 1,204
Integration auto-healonline · 318
Access & authz3 pending
O2C diagnosisonline · 261
Basis & jobsrunning · 44

Activity

09:42INC0048213 · IDoc 51→53 reprocessed (BD87)closed
09:39INC0049002 · role change drafted, sent to approverpending
09:31INC0048990 · batch rerun SM37, variant matchedrunning
09:27INC0048975 · credit block, routed to SAP O2C L2routed
Resolution funnel · 24h
418
Detected
402
Diagnosed
131
Proposed
124
Approved
121
Validated
118
Closed
02 · An agent's proposal, waiting for you
Proposed resolution · access & authorization agent
INC0049002SAP Security L2P3
Incident
short descUser cannot create sales orders for plant 1200, "not authorized"
reported bym.chen (Order Mgmt)
sourceServiceNow incident
What the agent found
root causeMissing authorization object on role; SU53 shows failed check for plant 1200
matched signatureAUTH-O2C-PLANT (412 prior tickets)
confidence0.88
What the agent will do · reversible
  1. Compare m.chen's roles to the "Order Management EU" template (PFCG)
  2. Draft role change: add the missing plant-1200 authorization
  3. On approval, submit change request to IAM, no direct production edit
  4. Verify the failed check now passes; update and close the incident
Risk & controls
HIGH · requires your approval
Preconditions the guardrail agent checked
  • Segregation of duties: no conflict introduced
  • Action on allowlist for this tenant
  • Change routed through IAM, not direct edit
  • Rollback: revert role assignment
Your decision
assignedJ. Okafor (Security lead)
SLAapprove within 4h
Approved by J. Okafor · agent submitted change request to IAM · verifying… ✓ failed check now passes · incident closed.
audit: proposal, approval, execution, verification, closure recorded · rollback available
03 · Assessment report
AMS Assessment · Summary
period: trailing 12 months · source: your service desk + SAP support data · status: draft
read-only · no production access
48,910
tickets analyzed
41%
recurring-pattern share
12–18%
modeled effort reduction yr 1
3.9h
median MTTR (current)

Top repetitive issues

Error signatureVolume / yrMedian MTTRModulesCandidate agent / playbookConf.
IDoc 51 · partner mismatch3,4102.1hO2C · EDIIntegration agent · BD87 + WE200.93
AUTH · plant not authorized2,9805.4hSecurityAccess agent · template diff + IAM0.88
Credit block (VKM)2,2403.0hO2C · FINO2C diagnosis · diagnose + route0.74
Batch job failure · variant1,7601.6hBasisBasis & jobs · rerun SM370.81
Invoice block (MIRO)1,5104.2hP2P · APP2P diagnosis · diagnose + draft0.69

Recommended roadmap

Phase 0
Assess

This report. Validate candidates and savings against your data.

Phase 1
Copilot

Triage and grounded resolution suggestions in shadow mode.

Phase 2
Approved execution

IDoc reprocess, batch rerun, access assist, with approval.

Phase 3
Closed-loop

End-to-end resolution for approved low-risk categories.

All figures are modeled from your own data and are targets, not guarantees. The effort-reduction range reflects the share that is both high-volume and low-risk after excluding work your platforms already handle and any category that fails a confidence or safety threshold. Data-quality findings (for example 6% of tickets with no resolution notes) are listed in the full report.
See it on your data

The mockups are generic. Your assessment would not be.

Request an assessment and we will run this against your own history.